home

sitelist

blog

contact

Knit Hat SEO Blog

It's not White Hat. It's not Black Hat. It's Knit Hat. Beautiful.

Friday, March 13, 2009

Social Network Fear Spending

Ok. This really cheeses me off...

“But Peter Yared, CEO of marketing firm iWidgets, said he thinks some of that spending is going to shift to where the viewers, and the traffic, increasingly are. 'Soon the [search-engine marketing and search-engine optimization] spend will start to follow the eyeballs and transition from Google to social media,' he said.”
- http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=135112

This all just smacks of the same sort of thing that got everyone into the financial crisis. (sorry. just watched jon stewart face off against jim cramer last night).

I can't say that my mind is boggled by the fact that the CEO of a marketing firm, specializing in Facebook widgets says that Facebook is becoming the center of the universe. A bunch of people who run companies specializing in Twitter and Facebook tell the masses that Facebook and Twitter are the most important things ever and your company will die if you don't start utilizing it? Meanwhile, no one knows what the heck to do with Facebook and Twitter. Know why? Because their companies don't FIT into that model.

"So what do brands need to know as they convert their Facebook pages to regular profiles in the next few days?"

What the? In the next few days? Don't assume we're going along with this because they say we just HAVE to. It smacks of fear-mongering. It sounds like a self-fulfilling prophecy designed to keep them in business. I could be wrong though. It's possible that I don't see the big picture and am just old-fashioned. (Quick question: How much activity does that MySpace page you just HAD to build get?)

Or...-maybe it's not best for YOU to go out and have a huge facebook and twitter presence (although some is probably worthwhile). Now, I suppose it's possible that people start these companies because there actually IS a market for this. It's possible that I'm totally wrong here and that Facebook will become the nexus for all internet traffic. But how does it turn into leads? Brand recognition? Ok, that I CAN see. For example, use your profile to start a Group that a lot of people can get behind. Creates brand affinity and awareness, and it's NOT advertising. There ARE ways to use Facebook. There Are!

"Soon the [search-engine marketing and search-engine optimization] spend will start to follow the eyeballs and transition from Google to social media."

The way I see it is like this. I don't care about the quantity of eyeballs. I care about the quality of eyeballs. If you take all the SEO and marketing people off of Twitter, you'd have like 53 people using it. 50,00,000 people looking for a drunk Brittany Spears on YouTube does not, in my mind make that the best place for me to place all of my marketing budget for selling cement mixers. Facebook has 175 million active users. All of whom CHOOSE who they talk to and listen to. Do they want to add someone to their friend-update-feed that's just selling them something? Highly doubt it. They get enough ads from everywhere else. This is where they go to talk to their "friends"... only. I could be wrong though.

Is a potential customer going to accept your site as a friend just to receive product offers from you? No. Maybe if you provide some genuinely useful content that someone everyday could use (because remember, these applications are getting checked EVERY DAY, every HOUR even). I just think that the only ones who are going to care, or "Friend" you, are marketing people, your employees and your competition.

UNLESS... you provide a supplementary offering so wonderful and out-of-the-box that ordinary people are compelled to want anything and everything to do with you.

I just think there's something inherently wrong with the model of blatantly trying to sell people something by acting like just another one of their "friends" on a social network. It's never going to happen (famous last words). Ever see a company's Twitter Followers vs. Follows numbers? Most of the time there are like 2 followers (employees) but they are following like 5,000 people. Most of whom just block the company from their feeds. It's called spam. I get it all the time. "Get a free laptop!" No thanks. But, I'll take your addition to MY "followers" number because it makes ME look more important to everyone else. It's all BS, folks.

The bottom line is, just be careful when reading articles saying that you have to start migrating everything to Facebook and Twitter or else you'll miss out on the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. Look at who is being interviewed. Are they CEOs of companies who have something to gain by telling you that you NEED this or you have to do that? Just think about it and spend wisely.

Monday, March 9, 2009

YouTube as the #2 Search Engine

There seems to be something in the water given to SES panelists that compels them to continue to stress the importance of YouTube being the #2 most popular search engine behind Google.

I just saw another article this morning on Aaron Wall's SEObook.com site.

Here's the quote from Jonathan Mendez, a speaker at SES New York:

"...This is clear as YouTube is now the #2 search engine, Facebook, eBay & Craigslist are in the top 10 search engines and Twitter is trying to position itself as a real-time search. Search is integral to the web experience."

While statistically true, is this really a relevant statistic? I think not.

Are you going to tell someone selling tractors or cement mix that they NEED to be on YouTube because that's where people are searching? Has anyone ever searched for a birthday present on YouTube? My guess is not a one.

Here's the bottom line. YouTube's #2 Search Engine status says nothing about the CONTENT of those searches. I asked a panelist about this at SES Chicago. Another panelist agreed with me and the other guy just got sore. Don't let the experts make you think you HAVE to have some kind of YouTube presence just because THEY say it's the #2 search engine. There are quite often other, more practical, efforts you can prioritize.

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Skittles Sitelinks Update

Skittles has finally fixed their IE sitelinks problem.

Now their homepage is the Wikipedia page. Wins the award for most annoying navigation evar!

Makes Hulk want to smash rainbow!!!

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Skittles Fails The Sitelink Rainbow

Do a search for "skittles" in Google using IE.

None of the sitelinks work. They all redirect in Firefox and Chrome.

Discuss amongst yourselves.

UPDATE: I did a little digging and it looks like their 404 page isn't firing in IE. I used Tamper Data in FF and right after you click on one of the sitelinks it successfully launches
Content-Location=http://www.skittles.com/404.htm?404;http://www.skittles.com:80/products/index.jsp.

Then it eventually makes it's way to
Content-Location=http://www.skittles.com/default.htm

Using HTTPWatch in IE, you never get to the 404 page.

+ 0.000 0.376 1066 503 GET 302 Redirect to http://www.skittles.com/fun/index.jsp http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.skittles.com/fun/index.jsp&ei=EXytSeqfI4yRngfFzeW_Bg&sa=X&oi=smap&resnum=1&ct=result&cd=2&usg=AFQjCNFBsnbVEMPDmMqs_1qjSwNl19tWSg

+ 0.377 0.017 0 0 GET (Cache) text/html http://www.skittles.com/fun/index.jsp

0.395 1066 503 2 requests

My question is why is it going to the 404 at all? Why not just have the pages work? Is it a function of using Facebook to run everything?

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Search Engines Get Canonical

Say goodbye to duplicate content, folks...

Basically, all the search engines will let you suggest the preferred URL you'd like them to focus all the SEO juice on:

To use Google's example, all you put in the head tag is something like this:

link rel="canonical" href="http://www.example.com/product.php?item=swedish-fish"

That's all there is to it, folks.

Here are the links to the new canonical goodness!

Google Webmaster Blog posting

Search Engine Land posting

For once, the search engines unite to make and SEO's life a little easier.

WOO HOO!!!

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Matt Cutts talks webspam

@onecaseman sent me this video of Google's Matt Cutts talkin' 'bout webspam.

Check it out!

Red Herrings in Google's Web Crawl Report

Found this interesting today when going through a site's Web Crawl error report in Google Webmaster Tools. I was looking at the 404s (not found) report and found a number of what looked to be partial URLs pointing at the site from hundreds of affiliate pages.

Turns out that Google has tried to follow a URL it found in a JavaScript function. The problem is that this URL is only the beginning of an address that was to be constructed using other variables from the JavaScript function. Google obviously can't run the function and put the whole thing together. It just found an "http://www.blahblahblah.com/and-so-on" and tried to go there.

What I find most interesting about this are the ramifications. Can you exploit this as an inbound link to another page? Does this pass page rank goodness? Would Google try to follow a URL in a JavaScript comment?

Interesting indeed.

Friday, January 9, 2009

In-Depth PageRank Article

A co-worker just sent me this link. I read through the article and it's pretty interesting if you place a lot of value on Page Rank.

"The Google PageRank Algorithm"

It pretty interesting since he also includes a PageRank Calculator.

Check it out folks!

home

sitelist

blog

contact